Comments on: Flight 1549 Questions http://lordtsukasa.comoj.com/flight-1549-questions-2/ Examining The Facts And Exposing The Truth Tue, 02 Mar 2010 15:31:16 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Anon http://lordtsukasa.comoj.com/flight-1549-questions-2/comment-page-1/#comment-6 Anon Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:00:49 +0000 http://lordtsukasa.comoj.com/?p=11#comment-6 Simon, you're a clever boy, but you're still a boy... and highly impressionable. Please don't think I'm trying to patronize you, I am not. Just because it's likely there were no planes on 9/11, doesn't mean every aviation 'incident' is staged either. Firstly, the missing plane in your first image. By the time there were that many boats on the scene, the majority of passengers had been safely taken from the wings and the plane itself has sunk quite a bit. Check this footage to see what I mean. http://tinyurl.com/cncxx5 and check about 30 secs in. Secondly, this 'tsunami' that would need to have been created when the plane entered the water. Not necessarily so at all in my view. Waves are created by storms or by displacement through objects hitting the water, but how big a wave isn't just down to size of the object. It's trajectory and velocity have a major bearing on this. Think about skimming a stone over the water compared to throwing a stone in an arch. Thirdly, about the livery being photoshopped. I know you got this from Markus Allen, and if you didn't, he would have surely have encouraged your viewpoint on this. If it is, please do us the favour of putting a different livery on the plane, just to prove how easy it is.... And lastly, I don't know if birds or other technical faults brought the plane down, and frankly I care even less. This is probably the same reason why the pilot forum is keeping out of it... Outrage? No. Simon, you’re a clever boy, but you’re still a boy… and highly impressionable.
Please don’t think I’m trying to patronize you, I am not.
Just because it’s likely there were no planes on 9/11, doesn’t mean every aviation ‘incident’ is staged either.

Firstly, the missing plane in your first image. By the time there were that many boats on the scene, the majority of passengers had been safely taken from the wings and the plane itself has sunk quite a bit. Check this footage to see what I mean.

http://tinyurl.com/cncxx5 and check about 30 secs in.

Secondly, this ‘tsunami’ that would need to have been created when the plane entered the water. Not necessarily so at all in my view. Waves are created by storms or by displacement through objects hitting the water, but how big a wave isn’t just down to size of the object. It’s trajectory and velocity have a major bearing on this. Think about skimming a stone over the water compared to throwing a stone in an arch.

Thirdly, about the livery being photoshopped. I know you got this from Markus Allen, and if you didn’t, he would have surely have encouraged your viewpoint on this. If it is, please do us the favour of putting a different livery on the plane, just to prove how easy it is….

And lastly, I don’t know if birds or other technical faults brought the plane down, and frankly I care even less. This is probably the same reason why the pilot forum is keeping out of it…

Outrage? No.

]]> By: Lee http://lordtsukasa.comoj.com/flight-1549-questions-2/comment-page-1/#comment-4 Lee Sun, 08 Feb 2009 12:56:47 +0000 http://lordtsukasa.comoj.com/?p=11#comment-4 LT i think maybe this time its for real the plane is already in contact with the water before it comes into shot, the photoshopped picture is probably done by a newspaper just to get the best shot possible even if it is contrived it doesn\'t mean fake. also the plane just took off and the wings are filled with aviation oil which floats this would keep the wings above water. This is probably why the pilot choose to put it down in the river the fuel tanks are full for a flight there is nowhere safe to drain it off so the river is the next best bet to stop a fire breaking out if the wings split. LT i think maybe this time its for real the plane is already in contact with the water before it comes into shot, the photoshopped picture is probably done by a newspaper just to get the best shot possible even if it is contrived it doesn\’t mean fake. also the plane just took off and the wings are filled with aviation oil which floats this would keep the wings above water.
This is probably why the pilot choose to put it down in the river the fuel tanks are full for a flight there is nowhere safe to drain it off so the river is the next best bet to stop a fire breaking out if the wings split.

]]>