Examining The Facts And Exposing The Truth

It was reported today that Karachi was hit by a bombing that killed 25 people. This triggered some riots in Pakistan. This event seems to work perfectly in the favor of the elite’s obvious Destabilize-Pakistan agenda, so we have to wonder about it’s authenticity.

An important city government official in Karachi said that the bombing was designed to “derail the peace of Karachi, to destabilise Karachi which is the jugular vein of Pakistan, the economic centre of Pakistan”

Already, problems are appearing.

Rehman Malik, the Minister of the Interior, “confirmed” that it was a suicide attack — how can he be so quickly sure? This isn’t the first time that this question has been asked of him. Internet researchers wondered how he knew all of the details about the explosives used in the covert US black operation that was the 2008 Marriott Hotel Bombing so quickly.

So, how does this politician keep getting the scoop before everyone else? He’s a spook. He has many intelligence connections and has a company that has close ties to British Intelligence. He was supposed to be protecting Bhutto when she was assassinated by a military/intelligence black-ops team, but he was nowhere to be found at the time. This raised many suspicions.

That Malik, an intelligence agent inside the Pakistani government, is telling us that this was a “suicide attack” so quickly, is enough to raise suspicions that the intelligence community is parroting a pre-written/planned cover story.

Other mysterious people are bolstering the “suicide story”:

“A black-bearded man in his 40s inserted himself into the main procession and a few seconds later a huge blast occurred,” one eyewitness, who was not identified, told a local network.

Who was this mysterious witness? Is their story of a bearded-man designed to give us the immediate assumption that this was another attack by “bearded Muslim radicals”?

PHOTOGRAPHS

Already, there are very strong indications that this is a fake, staged event. Those come in the form of obviously fake photographs of the event that are being published in the press. Look at the photograph that is at the beginning of this article. Save it and zoom in.

The bus fire does not look real, but more obvious is the fact that the man standing in front of the bus has no arms, and their head appears to be floating above their body. The man who is standing closest to the camera has “fire” pixels from the bus going through part of his head. The man to the left appears to be very unconcerned with the raging vehicle inferno to his right, but more concerned with the building in front of him, which is, aside from the outside, visibly unaffected.

Let’s call this the “Ghost Shot”. What’s with the phantom-like silhouette in the middle? And zoom in on the left — there is a mysterious, ghostly transparent man there.

========

Unfortunately, more and more events seem to be visually presented to us through fake photographs and mysterious, unidentified “sources”. This is because these events are not random occurrences, but planned/staged covert operations executed by the US Military and foreign/domestic intelligence agencies.

I have only examined two obviously fake photographs here, but you can look at the entire media-released photographic record of this event here.

The military has run a fearmongering black-op right in time for X-Mas!

A Northwest Airlines passenger from Nigeria, who said he was acting on al-Qaida’s instructions, tried to blow up the plane Friday as it was landing in Detroit, law enforcement and national security officials said.
Source

Just like the United 93 tale, the heroic passengers resisted and subdued the terrorist, who was, of course, a Muslim Arab (With an obvious Arab name — “Abdul Mudallad” or “Abdul Farouk Abdulmutallab”, depending on which propaganda news service you subscribe to). Now, he admits that his act was on the behalf of Al Qaeda, and we are inevitably left with the feeling that the “War On Terror” continues. Unnamed federal officials have, of course, announced that stricter screening measures will be necessary at the airports — as if they weren’t Orwellian enough!

So, a suspect with connections to the “Al Qaeda” bogeyman goes nuts on an airplane and is subdued. The day is saved, no one is hurt, the monthly injection of fear has been administered, and the very predictable “tightening of security measures” has been announced.

Thinking individuals, however, are again pointing out that Al Qaeda is, in reality, a CIA front.

The Mujahideen were the seeds that would grow into Al Qaeda. They were heavily financed/supported/supervised/armed/trained/taught by the CIA. Heavily involved in this operation was Zbigniew Brzezinski, who was Jimmy Carter’s National Security Adviser and the founder of the notorious elite “non-governmental organization” known as the Trilateral Commission.
Source
Source 2

Osama Bin Laden, who is said to be the leader of Al Qaeda, is a long-time CIA asset/operative who, according to at least one insider, worked for the CIA until the day of 9/11, which contradicts official claims that he cut ties with them long before the attacks. He is even said to have met with a CIA station chief at an American hospital in Dubai only two months before 9/11. According to documents, he used the CIA code-name “Tim Osman” to travel throughout the US, to tour US Military Bases, and to visit the White House. He has links to the Wackenhut-CIA “syndicate”.
Source
Source 2
Source 3
Source 4

The CIA continued to protect the Al Qaeda network well after it supposedly “broke ties” with it. Serious researchers maintain that Al Qaeda is still a front for the CIA. Webster Tarpley, an expert on false-flag operations, calls Al Qaeda “the CIA’s Arab legion”.
Source

Why set up a front like Al Qaeda? Well, the Cold War’s “Red Menace” was dying in the early 1990s. In August 1992, an article published by the prestigious CATO Institute stated that Islamic fundamentalism could serve as the new “manufactured enemy”, the new “bogeyman”. Six months after the publication of this article, the World Trade Center was bombed. It was this event that kicked off the “War On Islamic Terror”. It is now known that the bombers had received CIA training, that the “leader figure” (Ramzi Yousef) was a CIA operative, and that the FBI had monitored/supervised the entire operation.
Source

So, when we hear about a failed airplane bombing that is quickly connected to an “Al Qaeda operative” with an obvious Muslim name, and the event works right into the hands of the “scare agenda”, we need to wonder if the event was staged by the same agency that controls Al Qaeda — the CIA.

When one examines the official version, more problems become apparent. Initial reports stated that the man was on the government’s “No-Fly List”. This raised the obvious question of how he was even able to make it aboard the airplane. The stories were quickly changed to state that, while he was in some mysterious “law enforcement-intelligence database”, he was not on the No-Fly List.
Source

According to the feds, the suspect says that the explosive device he used was acquired in Yemen. Interestingly, Anwar Al-Awlaki ran away to Yemen. He was an extreme Islamic preacher and a likely US Intelligence “handler” who had connections to the 9/11 “hijackers”, 7/7 “bombers”, Fort Dix “terrorist plotters”, Toronto 18 “terrorist plotters”, and the Fort Hood “shooter”. Al-Awlaki is said to have been killed in a recent raid by the Yemeni security forces, but it is very possible that his role as a “handler” was becoming to obvious, and that his “death” was really just a retirement. Is it possible that Al-Awlaki provided this new “terrorist” with explosives?

Another issue is the FBI’s presence at the airport when the plane landed:

Federal Bureau of Investigation Special Agent Sandra R. Berchtold from the Detroit office confirmed that the FBI was at the airport, but she would not comment further.
Source

If all authorities knew was that there were indications of a “fire” on the plane, then why was the FBI already set-up at the airport? From the above article excerpt, you can see that they’re quite tight-lipped about it, so don’t bother asking them.

The government has ignored these problems, and instead has opted to conclusively state that the attack was planned by “Al Qaeda in Yemen”.
Source

They’ve also gone into detail about the explosives, which turn out to have been military:

Investigators say the suspect had more than 80 grams of PETN, a compound related to nitro-glycerin used by the military.
Source

How “Al Qaeda of Yemen” got their hands on military explosives is anyone’s guess. Personally, I would assert that “Al Qaeda of Yemen” is little more than an extension of the military and the intelligence services (CIA).

Interestingly, it turns out that the bomber is the son of a wealthy banker, who is now burying him in the press as a “radical” and a “terrorist”.
Source

The heroic passenger who subdued the bomber turns out to be a “video director/producer” from Amsterdam. Certainly a professional in the art of stagery/drama, right?
Source

We’re left with quite a few questions:

–Why did different news services provide different names for the suspect?

–Why did initial reports state that the suspect was on the No-Fly List?

–Why was the suspect on a “terror” watch list?

–Why was the FBI waiting at the airport when the plane landed and why are it’s officials being so tight-lipped about this fact?

–What contact, if any, did the suspect have with Anwar Al-Awlaki?

–What was the purpose of the suspect’s 11-day trip to Houston, Texas during August 2008? What did he do on this trip?

–Why was his father concerned that his son had become radicalized? Was it his warning, six months before, that put the suspect on the terror list?

–How did the suspect obtain military explosives?

–Is his father connected through the banks to the aristocracy, secret societies, or intelligence community?

–Was there more to Jasper Schuringa’s act of heroism than we’ve been told? What is his history as a video director/producer? Why does his photograph look fake?

I think it’s safe to conclude that this latest event is as fake as the attack on “poor, poor” Berlusconi.

================

UPDATES

Obama Campaigner Was On Flight

When investigating staged airplane incidents, we frequently find that many suspicious individuals are aboard as “bystanders”. Roey Rosenblith was a passenger on Flight 253 who said “This guy wanted to kill all of us, he had wanted to blow up the plane.”

Certainly, someone like this is a star witness for the official version, correct? Well, get this — he worked on the Obama campaign.

University College London and British Intelligence

According to the newsmedia, the suspect attended University College London. A quick look into this institution and one will find some very interesting connections:

Course advisors include Met Police, BTP, SOCA, ACPO, SO15, MI6, MoD, NaCTSO, and RUSI.
Source

This institution offers counter-terrorism courses in which students are advised by actual MI6/SO15/MOD personnel. Why does every “terrorist” have links to military/intelligence?

The Accomplices

Kurt and Lori Haskell are attorneys who were aboard Flight 253. At the airport in Amsterdam, they saw the suspect trying to get on the plane. He did not have a passport, and, as would be expected anywhere (let alone Amsterdam), it did not look like he was going to be allowed on the plane.

They say that a “sharply dressed” Indian man in his 50s accompanied the suspect. This “sharply dressed” man was tall, around 6 feet in height. His suit was tan. They describe the suspect as being a “short, poor” black man who appeared to be in their late teens. The Haskells thought they were an odd pair. When the ticket agent said that a passport was necessary in order to board, the well-dressed Indian claimed that the suspect was a Sudanese refugee — this was a lie, since the suspect was Nigerian. The ticket agent called for their manager.

The Indian man was able to get the suspect onto the flight, but did not board himself. The Haskells wondered if the manager had been bribed. Amsterdam is known to put a large amount of emphasis on airport security/safety, so the Haskells’ suspicions may have been correct.

When the incident happened, they were kept on the plane for 20 minutes. The Haskells found this strange, as a bomb that was aboard the plane could have gone off while they were being held aboard. The authorities’ strange lack of concern suggests that they knew that there was no threat of a second explosion on the plane.

After Flight 253’s landing, the Haskells saw another Indian man, this one appearing to be in his 30s. He was dressed in orange. Bomb sniffing dogs had detected explosives inside his bag. The FBI confirmed the event to them, telling them that the area was unsafe. This was confirmed by eyewitness Daniel Huisinga. Who was this man and what happened to him?

First, the FBI said that no one other than the suspect had been arrested. Then, they admitted that there had, indeed, been a second man, but that he had been from a different flight. After the Haskells and others pressured them, they admitted that the man was, indeed, on Flight 253.  They tell us that this man was questioned, then released, despite the fact that his bag upset the bomb-sniffing dog. Who was he and why was he released so fast after bomb-sniffing dogs were suspicious of him?

When Haskell was interviewed by the FBI, they told him that the man had not been released, and that he was still in custody because of immigration-related issues, which Haskell took to mean that he, like the suspect, did not have a passport. According to all of the current newsmedia reports, the detained man was released after questioning. Why can’t the FBI get their story straight?

Furthermore, the official version is now that the man was not arrested for having explosives, but that he was arrested because his papers were not in order. However, it is known that the man was arrested because the bomb-sniffing dog indicated that he had explosives. It certainly seems like the authorities are lying.

The FBI interviewed Kurt Haskell at his office. They showed him photographs and asked him to identify the people in them. One of them resembled the man who was arrested after the landing. The others were people who he did not know, and pictures of the suspect. In one strange incident, the FBI agents showed him a photograph of the suspect, which he identified, and then showed him another picture of the suspect, acting as if it was a different person, and asking him if he knew who it was? Haskell suspected that the FBI was trying to trick him. If he fell for the trick and said that he did not recognize the man in the second photograph, the FBI could brand him as unreliable.

He asked the FBI if they had the airport security footage, so that he could attempt to identify the Indian man who had accompanied the suspect. They told him that they were there to gather information from him, not the other way around. They appeared to be offended by his question. Why are they so resistant to releasing footage of the event?

To this day, the account of the Haskells has remained the same regarding the Indian accomplices. The government’s account has changed no less than four times. If you were a lawyer, which witness would you consider to be more credible — a witness whose story changed four times or a witness whose account remains unchanged since the day of the incident?

The Haskells complains that the Dutch military’s police force is attempting to discredit his claim of a “sharp-dressed man”.

Why Is The Haskell Account Important?

If the Haskells are telling the truth, then the mainstream newsmedia and federal government are engaging in a massive cover-up of the Indian accomplices at the airport. Kurt Haskell’s description of the interview that the FBI conducted with him is very disturbing — he says that the FBI agents were offended by his request to view security footage, and that they tried to trick him.

If this is true, it not only means that the FBI is not interested in conducting a meaningful investigation, but it means that they are trying very hard to cover up the truth, and to discredit/confuse important witnesses.

Why would the FBI cover up the Indian suspects? Why would they try to fool/confuse/discredit the Haskells?

Are The Haskells Dishonest?

Some people on the Internet are claiming that the Haskells are fake witnesses who are part of the ruling elite. They complain that photographs on their website appear to be fake. Are these people correct in suggesting that they are “simulation” witnesses who were merely created to move the investigation in a certain direction?

The Haskells have gotten promotion from mainstream news networks, as well as suspicious figures such as Jonathan Elinoff, Alex Jones, and Victor Thorn. Because of this, it is possible that their story is part of the cover-up.

After 9/11, many “eyewitnesses” claimed to have seen important things, and said that they wanted to fight the criminals. This was also the case for the JFK Assassination. If we are to seriously investigate the Detroit Plane-Bomb Incident, then we need to be suspicious of all witnesses, as some are part of the military or Papist Crime Network, and are attempting to lead us into a wall.

Asking why the military/intelligence community wouldn’t have provided their “patsy” with a passport is quite valid — they certainly had the capability, so why did they allow this suspicious event to happen?

Is The Controlled-Opposition Attempting To Discredit The Haskell couple?

If the Haskells are telling the truth, then we can expect that many in the “truth movement” would attempt to discredit their information. Serious investigators have realized that the “truth movement” is controlled by the military, and that the “truth leaders” are all frauds.

Take a look at the interview that Alex Jones conducted with Kurt Haskell:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/bombshell-eyewitness-revelations-confirmed-fbi-cover-up-of-flight-253-attack.html

Haskell states at the beginning that he does not want to say anything speculative or opinionated, because he fears that it will provide critics of his story with ammunition. This was a very valid concern. During the entire course of the interview, however, Jones attempted to ‘trap’ Haskell into a situation in which he would say something opinionated. At the end, he read out a quote in which he endorsed the 9/11 truth movement, and asked him to confirm on-the-record that the quote was accurate. Was Jones respecting his wishes?

In the second interview, Jones’ attempts at trapping Haskell become even more obvious, until it gets so bad that, at one point, Haskell says: “You’re putting words in my mouth, Alex.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2f_uSM5VXQ&feature=related

Other mysterious people have been attacking the credibility of the Haskells. Their account was brought up on the message board of the James Randi Educational Foundation (JREF), a fortress for believers of the official versions of just about, well, everything. If you challenge the official line of anything, you are automatically a moron, according to the army of childish, egotistical trolls that have come to be known as “JREFers”. Interestingly, their message board was created only one month prior to 9/11.

As soon as user “Childlike Empress” brought up the Haskell story, a mysterious person named “funk de fino” responded:

“More hearsay. I’m shocked!! His no passport junk has been shown to be claptrap. Anyone who has flown to the US from Schipol knows his story is full of holes.”
http://forums.randi.org/showpost.php?p=5472057&postcount=149

Another mysterious person called “Carlito” jumps into the post and
Last time I flew from Schipol to the US, they interrogated me for about 30 minutes. Business Class, round-trip. No one is making that trip without a valid passport.
http://forums.randi.org/showpost.php?p=5472091&postcount=150

After these two get their words in, “funk de fino” requests that Childlike Empress “take back” her assertions that the bombing was a conspiracy:
http://forums.randi.org/showpost.php?p=5472171&postcount=155

Obviously, the implication is that he was able to get on the flight because of what the Indian man said/did to the manager, whether it was a bribe or an impressive identity (”I’m top CIA, and I demand that you let this boy on the plane!”). Funk De Fino’s argument is ridiculous, as it assumes that this incident happened under normal circumstances — Kurt Haskell’s account suggests otherwise.

Who are these mysterious liars and why are they so concerned with discrediting the Haskells, and intimidating other users into dismissing their account?

Were The Indian Men Intelligence Agents?

The “sharply-dressed” Indian man at Amsterdam airport certainly sounds like an agent of the intelligence community. It is known that Indian intelligence works hand-in-hand with the CIA/MI6, as well as Mossad. Gordon Duff tells us:

“Israel and India are very close business partners, especially via their military contracts. Also, the Indian intelligence agency (Research and Analysis Wing) works hand-in-hand with Israel. Essentially, the two governments are one.”
http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/underwear_bomber__206.html

The Filmer

Coming soon…

These two photographs were taken within seconds of one another. Notice that the cuts do not match up — one or both of these photographs is fake.

QUESTION
Why would the newsmedia have to fake photographs if we were looking at a real event?

WHY FAKE IT?
It serves as a pretext for a crackdown against anti-government sentiment in Italy.

We’re lied to about everything, eh?

Introduction

On November 22, 1963, President John F. Kennedy was shot dead in Dallas. Police quickly arrested Lee Harvey Oswald for the crime, despite the fact that not a single shred of evidence pointed towards him.

No witnesses saw him, the fingerprint/rifle evidence was full of holes, and the re was a mountain of evidence to indicate that gunmen were firing shots at the front of the limousine, yet Oswald was at the back.

Nevertheless, Oswald was quickly arrested with no evidence against him and his entire life story was being published in newspapers in New Zealand before he was even charged with anything.

On November 5, 2009, 13 people were shot dead and 30 people were wounded when a horrific shooting took place at Fort Hood, a military base just outside of Killeen, TX. The shooter was quickly shot and taken into custody (after the media reported for half an hour that he had been killed), and there are contradictions as to who shot him. He was quickly identified as Nidal Hasan, a Jordanian-born Muslim who held the rank of Major in the US Army and was a mental health professional who helped people in the Army with stress problems. Very quickly, he was connected to the Al Qaeda organization and to radically anti-American Muslim clerics.

In both cases, the early reports began to disappear and a second, official version slowly began to come into place.

Reports Of More Than One Shooter

We are now being told that Nidal Hasan, alone, went into Fort Hood and fired into the crowd himself. However, this is not what was first reported.

Initially, it was reported that there were, in addition to other shooters, arrests of suspects.

All General Bob Cone had to say about this at the evening press conference was that the two had been released. He did not go into detail.

Examine the first reports:

“There are two confirmed suspect shooters, one in custody and another surrounded by swat in a building on post.”
http://www.kdhnews.com/news/story.aspx?s=36896

“Army spokesman Lt. Col. Nathan Banks … says two shooters were apparently involved.”
http://www.statesman.com/blogs/content/shared-gen/blogs/austin/blotter/entries/2009/11/05/army_7_dead_in_dual_attacks_at.html

“Milly Land, who works at the base fitness center, said she was headed for the graduation ceremony at 2 p.m. at the Howze Theater when the campus was locked down. She went back to the fitness center. She said she spoke by phone with friends at the soldier processing center, who said a gunman walked in about 1:30, walked to the medical area of the processing center, and started shooting. A second gunman was shooting at the theater next door, she said. ”
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33678801/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/?GT1=43001

“All three of the people believed to have carried out the shooting were soldiers, Lt. General Bob Cone told reporters Thursday evening.”
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,572305,00.html

“no.162
–rick perry (gov and bilderberg member) said there were 3 shooters”
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=143149.40

“Base spokesman Sergeant Major Jamie Poston
“At this point we’re looking for the other shooter…. ” he added.
“We are on the lookout for the second shooter,” Poston said.”
http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/afp/091105/world/us_shooting_crime_military

“One gunman was caught quickly but the second went on the run and was cornered by SWAT teams”
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/6510855/Seven-dead-in-shooting-at-Fort-Hood-military-base-in-Texas.html

“KCEN-TV in Waco is reporting that one gunman is in custody, the other is involved in a standoff with police. The station is reporting that there is a third shooter.”
http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/not_just_a_lone_gunman/

“Details of the events were sketchy, but officials said the shooting involved two men with M-16 rifles and began about 1:30 p.m.”
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/251/story/78425.html

“–”They are reporting a third shooter now.” [That source was Ms. Shine from the Public Affairs office of Killeen, TX]
–”3rd shooter now being reported as having been shooting “moments ago”.”
–”Shepard Smith was talking with someone who confirmed a 3rd shooter.”

–pg19[dwiggen] ”My buddy at Hood just told me that there’s a FOURTH SHOOTER! ….There is a confirmed FOURTH SHOOTER still at large. They just launched aircraft to search for him. My buddy.. who is an Apache mechanic, and they just got word to spin their birds up and go lookin for this guy.” “

All from: http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread516987/pg1

In fact, some of the very early reports described up to five shooters. It would appear that this massacre was not carried out by Hasan alone, but by a squad of shooters. This squad used Hasan as their patsy.

Reports Of Shootings In Many Areas

We are now being told that all of the shootings happened in one small area on the west side of the base known as the Soldier Rating and Processing Area.

However, initial reports told a much different story:

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread516987/
pg28 The local radio and eye witnesses also reported shootings at 4 other locations in the area. …. None of this is being covered nationally.[poster uncivilcivilian]

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33678801/ns … nd_courts/
…. according to NBC News affiliate KCEN in Waco, … the person was holed up in building 42006 on the base…

http://www.kdhnews.com/news/story.aspx?s=36896
Fort Hood officials have reported a shooting at the barracks by Howze Theater on Old Ironside and 41st Street

http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/11/05/tex … witnesses/
Arrest of a suspect at a golf course 2.5 miles from the attack, shortly after attack

http://www.CentralTexasNow.com/
As of 4:32 eastern, the warning sirens have started again. There are reports of gunfire again in one of the neighborhoods on post.

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=143149.40
no. 70
Additional shots were reported at a soldier’s residence, KCEN-TV reported around 4:30pm

http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andr … ne_gunman/
KCEN-TV in Waco is reporting that police have surrounded the PX at Fort Hood.

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=143149.40
no.195
There are reports this afternoon that there are one or more shooters at a PX (Post Exchange) at Fort Hood

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=143149.40
no.556
…the IRN announcement on GCN yesterday. A girl who wanted only to be identified as “tiffany” said that shots were being fired from THREE locations. She mentioned the places but I only remember her saying the PBX was one of the locations.

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread516987/pg1
–Not sure if it’s an actual troop or not, but a call just came into the local PD that a man with a gun & fatigues is at the Dollar Store. SWAT & units from the base are being mobilized.[poster thomasblackraven]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne … Texas.html
One gunman was caught quickly but the second went on the run and was cornered by SWAT teams in a traumatic brain injury unit on the base where a gun battle erupted
The evidence again points towards multiple shooters.

When shooting events, people holding themselves up in buildings, and chases are reported all over the base, then it becomes impossible to maintain the idea that there was only one shooter.

This is why all of these events, which did happen and were initially reported on, had to be erased from the final version of events.

Reports Of The Use Of A High-Powered Rifle

The official version now says that Hasan used semi-automatic handguns. However, initial reports and eyewitnesses tell another story:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20091105/ts … imemilitar
One of the shooters at large was believed to have a high-powered sniper rifle, and was holed up in a building surrounded by SWAT teams, MSNBC said.
“He heard small arms and some rifle fire while he was there…..”

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33678801/ns … nd_courts/
KCEN quoted a source as saying the shooter had a high-powered rifle.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2379445/posts
forum post no. 30
dead shooter had 2 handguns, captured major carried a rifle

http://forums.fingerlakes1.com/ubbthrea … ost1099739
2 suspects with M16s, 1 neutralized.

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=143149.40
forum post no. 572
I turned on Cnn.com at 2:30 central time. 1 hour after the shooting. They had a general on air, and said multiple times that they were using M-16s.

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread516987/pg3
–foxnews– A general is saying that M16s were involved [greeneyedleo]
–Retired Army General [Bob Scales] on the phone saying the weapons used were M16’s [CX]
–Local news from Central Texas is still stating an assault rifle and hand guns. [pg 36 justaposter]

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/251/story/78425.html
Details of the events were sketchy, but officials said the shooting involved two men with M-16 rifles

http://rigorousintuition.ca/board/viewt … c&start=75
From KCEN-TV in Waco, Texas:
Reports say the shooter had a high-powered rifle and was aiming to kill.

http://www.jackbloodforum.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=142108#p142108
I never before considered the first reports to be anything other than “media mistakes.” I recently talked to a friend of mine who is at Ft. Hood and was in an adjacent building during the incident. She graduated from “Combat Medic” school with me and was stationed at Ft. Hood after graduation. We were trained and qualified in both the M16/M4, and the M9 (9MM) handgun. She said that the shots she heard couldn’t possibly have been from handguns. She said it sounded like the “burst” mode from MULTIPLE rifles.

Hasan, the patsy, was armed with semi-automatic handguns. When he was shot, he was found with semi-automatic handguns. Thus, despite the fact that the other assailants used rifles, and that this was witnessed/heard/reported, the official version had to delete rifles from the plot-line.

Hasan: Radical Muslim Killer Or Patsy?

Like Oswald, Cho, Atta, McVeigh, Sirhan, and many other patsies, Hasan was not a loner with no connections to US Military/Intelligence. It is well-known that he held the rank of Major in the US Army. The military certainly had access to him. He was a psychiatrist, which is extremely interesting, in light of the fact that the CIA’s mind control programs used psychiatry as their “cover field”.

Hasan spent a lot of time around Blacksburg, VA. And, as is now being reported, he was a 1995 graduate of Virginia Tech University:

Hasan was Virginia native, Va. Tech graduate
http://www.nbc12.com/Global/story.asp?S=11454903

Virginia Tech University seems to be a magnet for horrible events. We will all remember that on April 16, 2007, Seung-Hui Cho allegedly murdered 32 people at the university before allegedly turning the gun on himself. The massacre at Virginia Tech has been thoroughly proven to have been a lie — a false-flag/black-ops covert operation carried out by US Military/Intelligence operations.

Beheadings are extremely unusual on college campuses, but a horrible beheading occurred on Virginia Tech when a student decapitated a female Chinese student with a kitchen knife. The two had been friends and had not been arguing prior to the event. There was no bad blood between them.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,482025,00.html

Two students from Virginia Tech were found dead about 15 miles from the campus in a Blacksburg campground. Both were shot dead:
http://hamptonroads.com/node/521158

In 2006, the brother of a US Army veteran broke out of prison and committed murders near Virginia Tech:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Morva#Escape_and_capture

What is going on in and around Virginia Tech? Perhaps a look into the connections of the institution will help us understand this.
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=6409

-Virginia Tech is financed by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), the research arm of the Pentagon. Virginia Tech is an active partner of DARPA. DARPA is deeply involved in continuing mind-control/MKULTRA research.

-Virginia Tech has on-campus “bird flu” experts (spooks). Bird Flu, like the Swine Flu, was engineered by the military-pharmaceutical complex.

-Virginia Tech focuses on DNA splicing, advanced disease control, biomedical engineering, bio-mechanics, tissue cell engineering, and behavioral science. It has departments focused on disaster trauma’s effects on children. These departments reported directly to Laura Bush, George W. Bush’s wife.Virginia Tech is also involved in neuroengineering (mind control) projects.

-The CIA has a strong presence at Virginia Tech, and frequently recruits students from it.

-Most Virginia Tech graduates go on to work for/with NASA.

-Virginia Tech is one of the only three public universities in the US that offers a military lifestyle, as well as a civilian lifestyle. It has a huge ROTC program. Hasan was part of this ROTC program.

-Virginia Tech is sacredly created with the same native limestone that was used to create the Egyptian Great Pyramid, which gets us into the ancient mystery religions/schools, and the Freemasonic/Illuminati significance of the Pyramids/Egypt.

According to mind control survivors, there is an underground laboratory controlled by DARPA in the Blacksburg area (7000 feet under a local mountain) that is involved in classified defense projects and mind control research:

“Blacksburg, VA houses a US government ABOVE TOP SECRET underground laboratory (in the side of a local Blacksburg mountain) that develops in conjunction with DARPA, weapons such as human robotic mind control programming.”
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/222840/strange_virginia_tech_coincidences.html?cat=7

Not surprisingly, Hasan’s connections to covert military projects don’t end there. After that, he graduated from the Center for Applied Behavior Systems, a US Psychological Operations training center. He then went onto study at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, a site for active MK-Ultra/Mind-Control research.

And, perhaps the most shocking of all, Hasan was a member of Obama’s Homeland Security Transition Team!

Now, we’re told that Hasan was a radically devout Islamist. Yet, stories of Hasan prior to the massacre paint a much different picture. Like the supposedly devout 9/11 hijackers, Hasan was a frequenter of strip clubs. Particularly, he enjoyed the Starz club. He bought a number of lap dances there and brought a six pack of beer. He sipped some of it, then gave the rest to the strippers.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,573052,00.html

Does this man sound like a devout Muslim, full of hatred for Western culture, to you?

He did go to a mosque, but there are some things you should know about that. Hasan’s mosque in Maryland wasn’t your everyday Islamic spiritual center. It was involved in financing CIA operations abroad:

The Muslim Community Center has held fundraisers for Chechen jihadists, and promotes on its website a Shariah-based financial product offered by a Muslim Brotherhood front group under federal investigation.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=115465

Webster Tarpley, an expert on false-flag operations and state-sponsored terrorism tells us:

The essential element here is that the mosque was raising money for Chechen rebellion, which is notoriously a strategic tool of the United States and the United Kingdom against Russia . Perhaps such a fundraiser for Chechen terrorism might have been attended by Ilyas Achmadov, the de facto ambassador of the leading CIA-backed Chechen organization implicated in terrorism, who lives in Washington , DC at US taxpayer expense thanks to his sponsorship by Zbigniew Brzezinski, and the gray eminence of Obama’s foreign policy team.
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=11637

So, “devout Muslim” Hasan’s mosque was involved in funding foreign covert operations being conducted by US Intelligence. Now, Hasan and his mother had practiced Islam at an Islamic center in Falls Church (Not too far from CIA headquarters) that was run by Anwar Awlaki/Awlaqi, who has a history of being a magnet for people who later end up being the patsies of US Military-Intelligence Operations. Hasan was a disciple of Awlaki, with deep respect for him — Awlaki was in a perfect position to ‘handle’ him.

Several of the alleged 9/11 hijackers attended Awlaki’s mosque, including Hani Hanjour. Hanjour was the alleged pilot of Flight 77, who, being described as a terrible pilot by his instructors, supposedly pulled off remarkable maneuvers that even professional pilots say are impossible, before slamming his airplane directly into the Pentagon. Awlaki’s other mosque in San Diego was, amazingly, also frequented by future alleged 9/11 hijackers, such as Khalid al-Midhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi. Awlaki met with Hazmi before, but “claimed not to remember any specifics of what they discussed”.

The so-called Toronto 18, who were ‘handled’ by FBI/RCMP agents, were admirers of Alwaki, and listened to his online sermons. Amazingly, Awlaki was also the inspiration for the “terrorist group” (also well-handled patsies) that tried to attack Fort Dix.

The US Military has a huge cyber warfare program, and has been caught monitoring/attacking sources of alternative media. Why has Alwaki’s site not been attacked? Why is it that he has ties to so many of the US Intelligence community’s “Oswalds”?

I think it is safe to say that Alwaki is what we call a “handler” — an operative of the US Military/Intelligence complex whose job is to inspire/foster future Intel patsies/dupes.

Interestingly, in the aftermath of the Fort Hood massacre, Awlaki praised Hasan’s actions on his website, and said that any true Muslim who joins the military should join it only to do the same. Could Awlaki’s actions be designed to hand one to the radically anti-Islamic right? Could they have been planned from the beginning to serve as part of the Islamic-Terrorism-Did-Fort-

Scores Dead In Peshwar Blast

During the course of the Iraq/Afghanistan wars, there have been countless “terrorist bombings” that always fuel the warmongering fire. Recently, a bombing Peshwar, Pakistan left many dead. The usual patsies denied involvement:

The Taliban and al-Qaeda have said they did not explode the bombs that caused 105 deaths in Peshawar on Wednesday.

So, if those guys did not do it, then who did?

Hakimullah Mehsud, head of the Tehrik-e-Taliban, said Blackwater and some Pakistani agencies were involved in the bomb explosion at a crowded market in Peshawar.

Erik Prince -- Founder/Head of Blackwater

That’s right — Blackwater. In fact, many researchers have suspected that firms like Blackwater, now known as Xe, are behind most of the terrorist attacks in Iraq/Afghanistan/Pakistan.

Now, remember that the Jesuit Crime Network has always been fully supportive of the Iraq/Afghanistan wars, which are, like the Vietnam War, a Vatican crusade.

Keeping that in mind, consider that the founder/head of Blackwater is Erik Prince, a practicing Roman Catholic. We read:

To that end, Mr. Prince intentionally deployed to Iraq certain men who shared his vision of Christian supremacy, knowing and wanting these men to take every available opportunity to murder Iraqis. Many of these men used call signs based on the Knights of the Templar, the warriors who fought the Crusades.

Students of history will remember that the Knights Templar were soldiers of the Vatican.

Roman Catholic Erik Prince considers himself to be a crusader for the Vatican, and considers his organization to be a modern Papal army of sorts.

This tells us a lot about what the Iraq War is all about. War on Terror? Try War on Heresy.

Joseph E. Schmitz -- Key Blackwater Man, Former Pentagon official

Another key man at Blackwater is Joseph E. Schmitz, who was, all his life, educated at Jesuit institutions. Schmitz, a practicing Roman Catholic, is a former professor at the Jesuit fortress of Washington DC, Georgetown University.

He is also a member of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta (SMOM), an elite Roman Catholic military order that has been called “the Pope’s militia”.

Schmitz is also a member of Opus Dei, an ultra-conservative Roman Catholic secret society. Schmitz’ father, John, is a graduate of the Jesuit fortress of Wisconsin (Marquette University).

There is little doubt that Erik Prince and Joseph Schmitz are just two of many Jesuit agents that are controlling Blackwater/Xe. The firm is a clear example of a Jesuit front.

The Peshwar Blast -- A Jesuit False-Flag?

At this point in time, Jesuits dominate the US Military-Intelligence Community. The Peshwar blast, like many other bombings in the Middle East, had the earmarks of a Jesuit false-flag.

Remembe, the Jesuit Oath states:

I furthermore promise and declare that I will, when opportunity present, make and wage relentless war, secretly or openly, against all heretics…

Using their Papal army, Blackwater/Xe, they have been executing countless bombings designed to incriminate Islamic heretics and increase the beating of the war drums.

This is not America’s war, it is the Jesuits’ war. Will you stand your ground against these slimy, shady, lying infiltrators?

One thing is for sure — you can’t trust your leaders to do so.